top of page
BENEFIT.PNG

Table 1 - Benefit

IMAGE 2 - Cost

 The table below summarizes the cost of each alternative.  The single point urban interchange is our most expensive alternative due to high pavement and structural items cost. While the most cost effective  is the Partial Cloverleaf alternative. 

COST.PNG

Table 2 - Cost

IMAGE 3 - Project Benefit/Cost Analysis

When comparing the total benefit and total cost of each alternative  the benefit/cost ratio is obtained. The partial cloverleaf alternative has the highest B/C ratio followed closely by Little League Tee.

bc.PNG

Table 3 - B/C Ratio

405-4054999_stacked-cpp-cba-color-logo-t

BENEFIT

COST ANALYSIS

IMAGE 1 - Benefit

 The benefit is derived from comparing the design life costs of the no build versus the design life costs of each alternative. The difference in costs is what's consider the benefit of each alternative. Essentially, the benefit is the amount of money saved from switching to an alternative as opposed to keeping the no build option. Factors taken into consideration were delay time, fuel consumption, and carbon emissions. The alternative with the highest benefit is the Par-clo (Partial Cloverleaf) as shown in table 1.

Disclaimer:
The information contained within this website is for academic purposes and is not in any way affiliated with the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, and Caltrans District 8's ongoing projects. This website reflects the findings of a Cal Poly Pomona senior project case study.

©2019 by I-215 and Palm Ave. Interchange Cal Poly Pomona Senior Project.

bottom of page